Decision Making
• In meeting the more → If possible emergency, a notice may be given by mail, the person who manages the application may decide whether any opposition was not outright emerges . → For celleux who can not come to the meeting, the agenda will now put online a few days before the meet and ilies may rule on the points they consider important.
Ultimately, the decision made in meeting minutes.
• Support consensus decision → What is consensus? Consensus is a mutual agreement, a "compromise" accepted by all.
consensus differs because of the compromise:
- It enables to consider all proposals and to go after the discussion;
- It avoids frustration
- He can express his disagreement with a final decision with which we do not fully agree and get back without necessarily oppose this "veto" that everyone has with this mode of decision making → can not participate when it is not totally opposed to getting things done.
- It requires thinking about things in the interest Group: I can not stay in a fixed position, and oppose anything that does not suit me fully. I'm trying to envision how my views can be articulated with one another to find that everyone there and a joint decision emerges.
- When an agreement emerges, those who fully adhere to the decision to organize the implementation. Those who see the minor objections may choose to stand behind the opinion of the group and also participate or prefer to stay back from the action.
The consensus is on acts that we choose to do in common, not on → keeps his opinions everyone freedom of thought. It is possible to admit that a decision needed via multiple paths. The important thing is to be convinced that what will be done is there better to do in the present context.
→ It is important to bear in mind the context in which things should be done: the decision must be realistic: what's agree on one thing we will not do?
The difficulties of this type of decision are:
Its slow: If the views are too far initially, a middle position can be difficult to find and it may take time.
Its difficulty to implement in a heterogeneous group and / or unaccustomed to this type of practice.
_____________________
Horizontality
→ Principle of equality between all and every participant.es
→ Requires sharing of functions and skills to avoid the formation of "experts" have become indispensable in their field and have thus a greater power than others.
specialization on certain items may weaken group: the defection of a "specialist" can prevent the realization of the process in which it is embedded. (Example = if one person can do the poster, the day it is not there or if she leaves the group, nobody can replace it and some activities no longer possible).
→ It must distinguish between the activities essential to the smooth running of the restaurant (like the poster) and related activities (conference, banner ...)
In the first case, we will seek to share experience and to rotate roles as possible. In the second, we can let people go to what interests, in this case, if one person can do something and it falls apart when she leaves, it is
not so bad ... In any case, it is not that everyone turns absolutely on all the activities, but to ensure a sharing of tasks allowing the relay will face in the absence and avoid that certain essential activities become the preserve of one person.
→ For now it's going pretty well!
